Why you should care

Because demonstrations have overthrown South Korea’s first and last presidents.

FIRST
100
DAYS
Smart analysis of the Trump presidency.Join OZY for regular dispatches, forward-looking analysis and smart commentary on the first 100 days of the Trump presidency.

Millions of women march in the nation’s capital. Thousands gather in cities around the country for spontaneous protests. An aroused citizenry floods its legislators with emails and increases donations to the political party in opposition.

Sounds like the U.S. following the election of Donald J. Trump? Sure, but South Korea got there first — and arguably much more effectively. Indeed, the movement to oust President Park Geun-hye, which met its substantive goal last week, achieved something else along the way. Observers say it marked a new kind of sustained social action — hyperorganized, laser-focused and buttressed by new networks. Some argue it could be a model across advanced industrial democracies, including, of course, the U.S. “Recent events [there] might be a blueprint for a progressive opposition in the U.S.,” says Doug McAdam, a sociology professor at Stanford University and a leading authority on social movements.

Of course, South Korean protesters were motivated by something anti-Trump forces lack thus far — proof of high crimes and misdemeanors. The protests in the East Asian country began in October when the National Assembly debated an impeachment vote triggered by corruption charges leveled against President Park Geun-hye. She was the nation’s first female leader and the daughter of Park Chung-hee, a military dictator who ruled from 1961 to 1979. The demonstrations continued after legislators voted to impeach Park and lasted until the country’s Constitutional Court confirmed the assembly’s decision and removed the president from power last week.

In all, one in five South Koreans participated in the president-must-go rallies over the past five months.

One key takeaway from the Korean example: persistence. Even though protests had been going on for months, anti-Park organizers were able to rally the faithful on the Saturday before the National Assembly’s December vote for what turned out to be the biggest demonstration in the country’s history — an estimated 2 million people. And, in the months that followed, as Park hunkered down in the executive mansion, known as the Blue House, to await the ruling from the high court, protesters held weekly candlelight vigils, keeping pressure on the president to resign. The high court’s decision triggered another mass demonstration; some activists in Seoul danced in the streets while others popped Champagne corks. In all, one in five South Koreans participated in the president-must-go rallies over the past five months.

In the U.S., initial momentum was there for anti-Trump forces. The day after the election, “the protest in New York was super disorganized but very forceful, as all the power came from the crowd,” says Korean-American Joon-kee Park, 21, an operations coordinator who marched in front of Trump Tower. While the New York protests felt more organic to Park than the February rally he attended in Seoul, demonstrations in New York fizzled out within a week until the Women’s March rebooted activism on the day after the inauguration.

Since then, Trump’s travel ban has sparked a swarming of airports and surly constituents publicly grilling their members of Congress, but there has been nothing like the doggedness of the South Korean protesters’ weekly candlelight vigils. “Mainstream media pulled wind out of the sails of the Women’s March by focusing on its lack of organization,” argues Kasper Smits, 27, an American musician who attended demonstrations that day in Santa Cruz, California, where about 10,000 people marched. He was there “not to topple Trump” but “in solidarity with my mother and sister.” Earlier in January, when he participated in a candlelight rally in Seoul, he was “stunned at how organized” it was and how much it felt like “a concert or a party.”

Gettyimages 651997702

South Korean demonstrators shoot off firecrackers to celebrate the impeachment of Park Geun-hye during a candlelight rally demanding arrest of the president in Seoul on March 11, 2017.

Source Jung Yeon-Je/Getty

Another key takeaway from the Korean experience that some experts note: focus. South Korean protesters may have held differing opinions on Park’s policies and political positions, but they were unified on a straightforward proposition — Park was corrupt and therefore had to go. McAdam suggests that the most effective strategy for anti-Trump protesters is to unite and focus their efforts on Trump’s Russian connection, where he thinks the president is “most vulnerable.”

It is, in fact, starting to look like the issue that won’t go away anytime soon. The former U.S. ambassador to Russia, Michael McFaul, wrote in an email to OZY that “it will take sustained pressure from society to force Congress to set up a bipartisan independent commission.” McFaul did not comment on whether he thinks Russia is Trump’s Achilles heel.

In South Korea, the Park scandal cut across party lines as members of the president’s ruling Saenuri Party defected in droves following weeks of protests. Opposition leader and presidential hopeful Moon Jae-in joined in the candlelight vigils and credited the demonstrations for pressuring legislators to investigate and impeach a powerful president who represented the country’s political and corporate establishment. In the U.S., even though Democrats and some Republican senators such as Lindsey Graham and John McCain have expressed concerns about Trump’s Russian ties, there’s been no sign of Republicans heading for the exits over the issue.

Gettyimages 622863624

Demonstrators protest against U.S. President-elect Donald Trump in front of Trump Tower on November 12, 2016, in New York.

Source Kena Betancur/Getty

Another telling aspect of the South Korean phenomenon: strength in unity. Social activism brought together disparate organizations in a common cause, a coalition that may turn out to be a powerful tool in the future to keep wayward politicians and parties in line. To organize the candlelight marches, for example, representatives from an alliance of some 1,500 civic groups met weekly to coordinate speakers, performers and march routes. In the U.S., some 30 groups partnered for the Women’s March. McAdam explains that American progressives have not mobilized together en masse because they have been “badly splintered” since the late 1960s.

Before you hit the streets, however, here’s a word of caution from a leader of the Women’s March, who is planning 10 actions within the first 100 days of the Trump presidency. Regarding the protests in South Korea, Janaye Ingram notes, “We all can learn from each other on a global space” and references Gandhi’s role in inspiring Martin Luther King Jr. “At the same time, we have to understand our democracy might look different than democracies from other places, and not all the same rules apply.”

Recommended Stories

Sponsored By sap

Recommended Stories

Sponsored By sap

OZYFast Forward

New trends and breakthrough thinking in politics, science, technology, business and culture. It’s futurism at its best.